![]() ![]() Power consumption data recorded by a smart metre can provide a lot of information about what’s happening in a home.So what will be important to think about to ensure that users benefit and get value from devices and their related services, but avoid adding security issues? Should we risk unintentionally becoming surrounded by data paparazzi with their viewfinder aimed at us? What to protect?Īt first, this data may be seen as producing no risk, but even simple data in a certain context may be sensitive. ![]() The security risks must be handled by all actors in the value chain, including the device owner, regardless if devices are used by consumers, industries, or smart cities. And with more devices coming into homes, concerns around the way personal data is managed, controlled and used by devices and organisations are increasingly being raised.Įach new device may introduce a new security risk, if not properly managed through its life cycle. Smart assistants listen to our voice commands and take that information to the internet to execute our orders.ĭata from one device may not be a problem, but combining data from several devices could create a pattern that may reveal unwanted information about a user or a business. Today, our devices collect and forward information to all sorts of external parties: our home security alarm provider, our electricity supplier, our fitness watch vendor, our car manufacturer, and so on. In a similar vein, could the increasing number of smart, connected devices coming into our lives start acting like covert “data paparazzi”? ![]() The paparazzi are known for often taking covert photographs of celebrities and selling them to tabloids or gossip magazines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |